"Todd's A Whore..."
This last Sunday I went and visited George the Neo-Con about helping him with a series of syndicated Op-Ed-style cartoons that he'd like to bind and shop around to various papers and magazines. He even called into the talk shows of such luminaries of intellectual thought as Michael Savidge and Shaun Hannity to see what they thought of the idea. They thought it was a great idea that they'd like to read themselves.
The only problem is that they all have an obvious Neo-Con bent to them. So much so that it's becoming difficult for me to finish them in good conscience.
Although some of the ideas are genuinely funny, they are the exact opposite of what I think as a Liberal. It would be interesting for people to find out that a Liberal artist drew the ideas of a Neo-Con, though... I imagine that I'd be mocked by artists that I respect for being a "sell-out" or a "mouth-piece".
In essence, I'd be called a whore.
So, as a way of solving this little problem I'm going to do the five that I have promised to work on and break it off with George.
Here's the reason why:
George met me a while back and told about his idea -that we're working on again, a Syndicated Cartoon with a Neo-Con spin- but it wasn't the idea that I thought would actually sell, which was my idea. Most comic nerds like me know what a "Prestige Format" Graphic Novel is; it's a series of six to twelve issues bound under one cover so that you can cheaply and easily follow the story-line from it's beginning to it's conclusion.
My idea was to make a graphic novel of the two of us speaking honestly about what we felt about certain subjects, from Abortion and Welfare to Race and Religion. Both of us would have one page each to give a little monologue on the subject agreed to, that I would illustrate. We would then have seven to ten pages of both of us talking about the subject. We also were going to throw little site gags and recurring characters into the mix to lighten the mood if it got too heated.
Sounds like a good idea, right? Neo-Cons and Liberals both would love it, since both of their opinions are being voiced, and by the two characters talking about it, it could clear some stuff up that isn't getting addressed in the media. To me, it seemed like an honest way to get both points across without it turning into a political debate version of The Jerry Springer Show, which is what passes for political debate nowadays.
With my idea eventually trashed, George decided to go back to the original, which to me was and is a talking-points version of a cartoon that doesn't really say anything new. I kind of feel bad for George, since he's not an artist, so he can't draw his own ideas on paper for himself, and has to rely on someone else to do it for him. The biggest problem with him finding an artist to do this kind of series for him is that around 90% of artists are Liberals, and are typically open-minded on most social issues, which creates problems.
When I get the five done that I'm working on, I'll put them up on this Blog so everyone can see what I'm talking about, but until then, I'll see you guys later...
The only problem is that they all have an obvious Neo-Con bent to them. So much so that it's becoming difficult for me to finish them in good conscience.
Although some of the ideas are genuinely funny, they are the exact opposite of what I think as a Liberal. It would be interesting for people to find out that a Liberal artist drew the ideas of a Neo-Con, though... I imagine that I'd be mocked by artists that I respect for being a "sell-out" or a "mouth-piece".
In essence, I'd be called a whore.
So, as a way of solving this little problem I'm going to do the five that I have promised to work on and break it off with George.
Here's the reason why:
George met me a while back and told about his idea -that we're working on again, a Syndicated Cartoon with a Neo-Con spin- but it wasn't the idea that I thought would actually sell, which was my idea. Most comic nerds like me know what a "Prestige Format" Graphic Novel is; it's a series of six to twelve issues bound under one cover so that you can cheaply and easily follow the story-line from it's beginning to it's conclusion.
My idea was to make a graphic novel of the two of us speaking honestly about what we felt about certain subjects, from Abortion and Welfare to Race and Religion. Both of us would have one page each to give a little monologue on the subject agreed to, that I would illustrate. We would then have seven to ten pages of both of us talking about the subject. We also were going to throw little site gags and recurring characters into the mix to lighten the mood if it got too heated.
Sounds like a good idea, right? Neo-Cons and Liberals both would love it, since both of their opinions are being voiced, and by the two characters talking about it, it could clear some stuff up that isn't getting addressed in the media. To me, it seemed like an honest way to get both points across without it turning into a political debate version of The Jerry Springer Show, which is what passes for political debate nowadays.
With my idea eventually trashed, George decided to go back to the original, which to me was and is a talking-points version of a cartoon that doesn't really say anything new. I kind of feel bad for George, since he's not an artist, so he can't draw his own ideas on paper for himself, and has to rely on someone else to do it for him. The biggest problem with him finding an artist to do this kind of series for him is that around 90% of artists are Liberals, and are typically open-minded on most social issues, which creates problems.
When I get the five done that I'm working on, I'll put them up on this Blog so everyone can see what I'm talking about, but until then, I'll see you guys later...
6 Comments:
I look forward to seeing the results. If you want to clear your conscious, donate some of what you make to liberal causes. Remember that there are more then two colors in the political spectrum. My radical gay neo-objectivist independent/libertarian views would probably give both you and George a headache.
And just remember the two most important things about being a whore: get paid and wear a condom.
;)
On the other hand... whore's make a nice living... Then again, you'd be in bed with neo-con's, and who KNOWS what you'd catch! EW!
LMAO....
I was just going to thank you for voting in the changes in your mid-terms, as a constituent living in Ealing Acton, it's far more important to me which way you guys vote, so my thanks to you. Though if you followed the logic of the tea party, you should be paying most of our taxation revenue. Right wingers here have no artistic comedic or more importantly Celebrity attractions. I wanted to offer support. You say whore as it if its a bad thing, far too judgemental for a true liberal. I admire the tortured self-censorship, are you sure there isn't any of the equally adolescent liberal, I must not do anything to succeed in life, because then I become part of the problem instead of a harmless bystander who whines about the problem. I presume you are gifted enough an artist to put in conceits so if the pictures were rotated 45 degrees from the XYZ axes some terrible irony would be revealed, the guy who wrote Da Vinci code wasn't bright, clearly wasn't a liberal coz he is quite content to make money. And I assure you I won't be poo poohing your collaboration. I am after all a snob and therefore I would never ordinarily read political commentary when it is contained within bubbles, (though if you ever get a chance to read those begginners guides in cartoon absolute works of genius). Desie X didnt think it worth getting a whole blogger account to have a rant and I keep forgetting how to log in.
I must admit to a certain level of confusion on what you wrote... perhaps it's because of the way that you wrote your comment.
However, I get the basics of what you were saying. You think that I'm calling myself a "whore" as a means of being judgemental? No... I don't think so. Anybody who does something that goes against most of the things they believe would likely think of themselves as whores... Liberal or not. Picture a person who does the "news" on FoxNews... and then think of that person being a Liberal... it'd kind of be like that.
I don't think that this is an instance where you could call how I feel "self-censorship", either. Self-censorship doesn't really apply to this. Censorship implies that I really think that the ideas that George has are exactly what I think... which isn't correct.
What is it about people that think that Liberals don't like to make money? I like making money as much as anyone, but I don't like to make money doing something contradictory to how I think and live my life. As to Dan Brown, he made a lot of money off of the book he wrote, likely because he was interested in the idea that the book is founded on.
Is he a Liberal? I don't know, but from what I've heard, that book sucked as badly as the movie did.
I'm not new to illustration, but the Op-Ed-style of cartooning is different to me, since I do Comic-Book-style artwork, and I'm more used to the pacing, lighting and dimensions of that stuff.
We'll see how it turns out though, shan't we?
I must admit to a certain level of confusion on what you wrote... perhaps it's because of the way that you wrote your comment.
However, I get the basics of what you were saying. You think that I'm calling myself a "whore" as a means of being judgemental? No... I don't think so. Anybody who does something that goes against most of the things they believe would likely think of themselves as whores... Liberal or not. Picture a person who does the "news" on FoxNews... and then think of that person being a Liberal... it'd kind of be like that.
I don't think that this is an instance where you could call how I feel "self-censorship", either. Self-censorship doesn't really apply to this. Censorship implies that I really think that the ideas that George has are exactly what I think... which isn't correct.
What is it about people that think that Liberals don't like to make money? I like making money as much as anyone, but I don't like to make money doing something contradictory to how I think and live my life. As to Dan Brown, he made a lot of money off of the book he wrote, likely because he was interested in the idea that the book is founded on.
Is he a Liberal? I don't know, but from what I've heard, that book sucked as badly as the movie did.
I'm not new to illustration, but the Op-Ed-style of cartooning is different to me, since I do Comic-Book-style artwork, and I'm more used to the pacing, lighting and dimensions of that stuff.
We'll see how it turns out though, shan't we?
Post a Comment
<< Home